Community Assessment ( HIV population in Forth Myers)

Section I & II Assessment Paper A1.2 – Section I & II PHNAT paper DUE June 4, 2016 (250 points) (Turnitin is enabled for this paper – please review the score as it must be less than 20% match) Utilize the APA Tutorial (Links to an external site.) for appropriate formatting specifically title page, running head, pagination, reference page, appropriate citations, direct quote citations, use of headings throughout the paper. NO ABSTRACT IS NEEDED, NO AUTHOR’S NOTE IS NEEDED. This paper is based on Sections I & II of the PHNAT found in text. You will be collecting data about the population, epidemiological information on diseases , vital statistics, and the social, behavioral, and environments areas of the community. Section I & II give specific guidance on content. The paper should summarize data discovered in your investigation. Selected data can be illustrated with tables appropriately cited/ referenced per APA format. You do NOT submit a completed PHNAT tool as this will result in a 0 for this assignment. The content in this paper will be synthesized into the resulting Community Assessment Paper due later in the term retaining the Section I & II areas. As you work on the data in this assignment, you will be able to see areas with gaps in services or opportunities for a new program for Section III & IV. Be sure to address how the community/ public health nurse can utilized the data found in I & II. Rubric Section I & II ASSESSMENt PAPER Section I & II ASSESSMENt PAPER Criteria Ratings Pts Introduction Purpose and overview of Section I & II PHNAT Exceptinal – Topics are covered in a complete and concise manner. Demonstrates clear understanding of the relevance and significance to nursing practice 30.0 pts Good – Topics are covered but limited substance. Conveys understanding of the relevance and significance to nursing practice 25.0 pts Needs Improvement – Topics only slightly covered and paper lacks substance. Minimal or unclear application to professional nursing practice. 20.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient – Incomplete or confusing. No application to professional nursing practice. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts Survey addresses specific population and community data relevant to course focus of community / public health. Data supported from relevant sources as per reference criteria Exceptional -Demonstrates clear understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Demonstrates clearly the conclusions reached with implications for practice Clearly demonstrates critical thinking 75.0 pts Good – Conveys understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conveys conclusions reached with implications for practice. Shows critical thinking 65.0 pts Needs Improvement – Shows lack of understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conclusions not clearly shown. Shows lack of critical thinking in implications for clinical practice 55.0 pts Insufficient or Lacking – Lack of understanding and critical thinking. No evidence of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Lack of conclusions and implications for practice 0.0 pts 75.0 pts Implications for Nursing -Discusses findings, conclusions. Practice recommendations included. Exceptional – Demonstrates clear understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Demonstrates clearly the conclusions reached with implications for practice Clearly demonstrates critical thinking 75.0 pts Good – Conveys understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conveys conclusions reached with implications for practice. Shows critical thinking 65.0 pts Needs Improvement – Shows lack of understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conclusions not clearly shown. Shows lack of critical thinking in implications for clinical practice 55.0 pts Insufficient or Lacking – Lack of understanding and critical thinking. No evidence of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Lack of conclusions and implications for practice 0.0 pts 75.0 pts References reflect research related to the community and nursing practice Exceptional – Minimum of 3 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health – 2 must be from peer reviewed professional journals 30.0 pts Good – Minimum of 3 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health – 1 must be from peer reviewed professional journals 25.0 pts Needs Improvement – Minimum of 2 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health and or lack of professional peer reviewed journals 20.0 pts Insufficient or Lacking – No references cited and referenced 0.0 pts 30.0 pts APA Format Exceptional – Correct APA formatting and citations 30.0 pts Good – Minor errors in APA formatting and citations. 25.0 pts Needs Improvement – Minor errors in APA formatting and citations. 20.0 pts Insufficient or Lacking – Lacks APA citations, formatting and/or reference list. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts Organization, Clarity, Grammar, and Spelling Exceptional – Well organized, thought out, and structured. Proper grammar and spelling 10.0 pts Good – Organized and structured. Minor problems with clarity or application to professional nursing practice. Contains minor errors in grammar and spelling. 7.0 pts Needs Improvement – Poor structure and/or organization, distracting. Multiple errors in grammar and spelling. 5.0 pts Insufficient or Lacking – Lacks organization or structure. Poor grammar and spelling – shows lack of proofreading 0.0 pts 10.0 pts Total Points .1. NURS 4636L Practicum COMMUNITY SURVEY PROJECT (Note: This should be started during your first week of course). This scholarly capstone paper due date is June 14, 2016. It should reflect quality work and not simply a collection of forms such as a completed Public Health Nursing Assessment Tool (PHNAT tool) or your Section I & II of the PHNAT. See Grade Rubric for further information to guide the areas to cover in your paper. Use the PHNAT tool found in Trujillo-Londrigan & Lewenson, page 67, Chapter 3 Appendix. DO NOT MERELY COMPLETE THE PHNAT and submit. This is a scholarly assessment of the community and development of a program or initiative to meet a specific identified gap or need. Use your local community. Prepare a community assessment document. This is a scholarly paper using information based on The PHNAT. Use the PHNAT tool, Parts I, II, III, IV and V found in resources and your text to guide your assessment and the resulting paper. The paper should reflect operationalization of elements of professional nursing practice at the BSN level. Use the sections of the PHNAT tool to construct your paper. You may include selected data in tables but summarize the data you have collected in paper format. You can use the sections to organize your paper. Discuss your findings from the assessment and how it influenced your selection of priorities. (Part I and II.) You may include selected data tables but you need to discuss the data findings. This should be condensed from the Section 1&2 paper information. (DUE 2/3/16.) Select the number one (1) priority from Part III., PHNAT tool findings. Discuss the required elements including why you selected your priority for action. Remember that the priority must be realistic, achievable within specified time of plan, and within the scope of professional PHN/community health nursing practice. Develop Part IV which Includes A plan, implementation and evaluation of the intervention using the Minnesota Public Health Intervention Strategies. This can be an existing program that needs improvement or strengthening or a new one not previously discussed or operationalized. It MUST be within the scope of PHN/ community health professional nursing practice. Your initiative/ program should reflect levels of prevention and level of intervention (individual through systems as appropriate). Evaluation of the program/ initiative must be addressed with specific measurable items with time framework. The initiative/ program must explicitly address how the community / public health nurse will play a clearly developed role. The reflective section (Part V.) should be a discussion of your learning during the assessment and planning process. Be sure to relate it to your current practice and how you have changed as a professional nurse as a result of this project. This capstone paper must be supported by references with APA formatting, style and clarity followed. See APA guidelines for scholarly paper format. All data should be cited and referenced and supported by high quality sources. Structure the report in same content areas as found on in the PHNAT tool, e.g. Sections I, II, III, IV and V. Rubric COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT SURVEY PROJECT COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT SURVEY PROJECT Criteria Ratings Pts Introduction Purpose and overview of survey and its significance to practice Exceptional – Topics are covered in a complete and concise manner. Demonstrates clear understanding of the relevance and significance to nursing practice 75.0 pts Meet Expectations – Topics are covered but limited substance. Conveys understanding of the relevance and significance to nursing practice. 65.0 pts Needs Improvement – Topics only slightly covered and paper lacks substance. Minimal or unclear application to professional nursing practice. 50.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient (0-30 points) – Incomplete or confusing. No application to professional nursing practice. 0.0 pts 75.0 pts Survey addresses specific population and community data relevant to course focus of community / public health. Data supported from relevant sources as per reference criteria Exceptional – Topics are covered in a complete and concise manner. Data supported by current and appropriate resources and references. Reflects in depth discussion of population and community elements 100.0 pts Meet Expectations – Topics are covered but limited substance. Data supported by current and appropriate resources and references. Reflects discussion of population and community elements 85.0 pts Needs Improvement – Topics only slightly covered and paper lacks substance. Minimal or unclear data not well supported by current and appropriate resources and references. Reflects minimal discussion of population and community elements 70.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient (0-30 points) – Incomplete or confusing. No data supported by current and appropriate resources and references. Lacks discussion of population and community elements 0.0 pts 100.0 pts Implications for Nursing -Discusses findings, conclusions and summary of survey. Practice recommendations included Exceptional – Demonstrates clear understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Demonstrates clearly the conclusions reached with implications for practice Summary clearly demonstrates critical thinking 100.0 pts Meet Expectations – Conveys understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conveys conclusions reached with implications for practice. Summary shows critical thinking 85.0 pts Needs Improvement – Shows lack of understanding of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Conclusions not clearly shown. Shows lack of critical thinking in summary and implications for clinical practice 70.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient (0-30 points) – Lack of understanding and critical thinking. No evidence of findings and the recommendations for nursing practice Lack of conclusions and implications for practice (0-40 points) 0.0 pts 100.0 pts References reflect research related to the community and nursing practice Exceptional – Minimum of 4 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health 50.0 pts Meet Expectations – Minimum of 3 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health 40.0 pts Needs Improvement -Minimum of 2 references from government or public data, peer reviewed journals in nursing or public health 30.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient (0-30 points) – No references cited and referenced (0-20) points) 0.0 pts 50.0 pts APA Format Exceptional – Correct APA formatting and citations 50.0 pts Meet Expectations – Minor errors in APA formatting and citations. 40.0 pts Needs Improvement – Multiple errors in APA formatting and citations. 30.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient (0-30 points) – Lacks APA citations, formatting and/or reference list. 0.0 pts 50.0 pts Organization, Clarity, Grammar, and Spelling Exceptional – Well organized, thought out, and structured. Proper grammar and spelling 25.0 pts Meet Expectations – Organized and structured. Minor problems with clarity or application to professional nursing practice. Contains minor errors in grammar and spelling. 20.0 pts Needs Improvement – Poor structure and/or organization, distracting. Multiple errors in grammar and spelling 15.0 pts Lacking or Insufficient – Lacks organization or structure. Poor grammar and spelling – shows lack of proofreading. (0-5 points) 0.0 pts 25.0 pts Total Points: 400.0 Previous Next