Meaningful Use for Nurses Implications and Recommendations

Meaningful Use for Nurses: Implications and Recommendations Guidelines with Scoring Rubric Purpose This assignment is designed to help students: – understand the implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy-making, patient outcomes, and population health associated with the collection and use of Meaningful Use core criteria. Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the following ability. (CO 3) Examine the ethical/legal issues arising in NI practice while using, designing, managing, upgrading, and building information systems. (POs 4, 6) Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. Total Points Possible: 325 Requirements: Provide an overview of the Meaningful Use program and an analysis of the implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy, patient outcomes, and population health associated with the collection and use of Meaningful Use core criteria. Recommend additional core criteria not presently identified for Meaningful Use collection in Stages 1 or 2 (lists of criteria may be found at cms.gov) that you feel would be beneficial for nurses, nursing, monitoring population health, setting national health policies, and/or improvements in patient outcomes or population health, providing your evidence for your recommendations. If you feel that no additional criteria are necessary, provide your evidence-based rationale for your argument. Conclude with insights gained from this assignment. A minimum of three outside scholarly resources are required-texts may be cited but are NOT included among the minimum of three outside scholarly resources. PREPARING THE PAPER 1. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside course readings. 2. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition. 3. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is 5-7 pages in length. 4. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly. 5. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing. Category Points % Description Introduction 55 15 Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and names parts of the paper. Overview of Meaningful Use 55 15 Provides an overview of the Meaningful Use program. Analysis 65 20 Analyzes the implications of Meaningful Use core criteria. Meaningful Use Recommendations 65 20 Provides evidence-based recommendations for the collection of additional criteria OR for why no additional criteria are felt to be necessary. Conclusion 55 15 Concluding statements summarize the analysis and recommendations as well as the insights gained during the assignment. APA Style 10 5 Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. Citations 10 5 Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. Writing Mechanics 10 5 Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, and page restrictions are met. Total 325 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance Content Possible Points = 295 Points Introduction 55 Points 49 Points 44 Points 21 Points 0 Points Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and names the key parts of the paper. Introduction presents one of the two required elements. Introduction does not include either of the two required elements. Minimal attempt at introduction. No introduction is present. Overview of Meaningful Use 55 Points 49 Points 44 Points 21 Points 0 Points Provides a thorough overview of Meaningful Use background, requirements, and intent. Overview of Meaningful Use presents a thorough overview of two of the three areas. Overview of Meaningful Use is somewhat unclear and missing one of the three areas. Overview of Meaningful Use is incomplete. No Overview of Meaningful Use. Analysis 65 Points 57 Points 52 Points 25 Points 0 Points Provides a detailed analysis of the implications of Meaningful Use core criteria. Detailed analysis for implications of only three of the following implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy, patient outcomes, and population health. Detailed analysis for implications of only two of the following implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy, patient outcomes, and population health OR analysis addresses all areas incompletely. Detailed analysis for implications of only one of the following implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy, patient outcomes, and population health AND analysis addresses all areas incompletely. Limited to no analysis. Meaningful Use Recommendations 65 Points 57 Points 52 Points 25 Points 0 Points Provides detailed, evidence-based recommendations for the collection of additional criteria OR for why no additional criteria are felt to be necessary. Provides evidence-based recommendations for the collection of additional criteria OR for why no additional criteria are felt to be necessary but does not discuss in detail. Provides evidence-based recommendations for the collection of additional criteria (OR for why no additional criteria are felt to be necessary) but provides no discussion. Provides recommendations that are not evidence based for the collection of additional criteria and provides no discussion. Fails to provide evidence or recommendations. Conclusion 55 Points 49 Points 44 Points 21 Points 0 Points Provides a summary of key points of the paper as well as insights gained during the assignment. Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. Provides a summary of key points OR a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment but failes to include both. Concluding statements are present but do not address insights

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Uncategorized