1. Read the following journal article: Jane, S., Wilkie, D., Galluci, B., & Beaton, R. (2008). Systematic review of massage intervention for adult patients with cancer: A methodological perspective. Cancer Nursing, 31(6), E24-E35. This article provides a methodological review of research studies on massage therapy for cancer patients. The article gives insight into the research methodological issues to consider when reviewing research studies. identify one issue that was identified related to either sampling or measurement in the research studies the authors reviewed. Specifically identify the problem identified in the article and address how it was either a sampling or measurement problem. Also, identify whether or not the problem they identified related to power and sample size and explain your rationale.Your reply postings are due on or before 8 a.m. Monday at the end of Week 4. #2 Use the Hand Hygiene Article for Results and Data Analysis -What are the main findings? Be specific. Note any difference in means, correlations, or measures of clinical effect.Report the significant findings such as for a significant ANOVA result, F=7.6, df=75, p=.03. -What level of significance or alpha was identified? -What statistical analyses are included in the study? -Was there anything about the way the participants were chosen or their characteristics that could have influenced the findings? Explain. -Was there anything about the way the study was done that could have influenced the findings(s)? Explain. -If an intervention was tested, if no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to find a difference if one existed? Explain. – Did the investigators explain how each finding was either consistent with or different from previous findings? Explain. -Are the limitations of the study identified by the researcher? If so, how did these impact the results? Application to Future Research and Summary of Credibility of Study -What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? -Do the implications identified by the authors flow from the study results? Explain. -What recommendations do the authors have for future research? -In summary, would you change a care protocol based on the results of this study? Explain. In your explanation report the following: a) What is the level of evidence of this study and does this support change? b) What is the quality of the study based on the critique? c) What is the power and sample size implications? d) Are there significant findings to consider, e) should patient preferences and clinical expertise be considered in your decision? Format of the Critique Introduction, body, and conclusion structure of the paper; clear syntax and flow; grammar, punctuation, and spelling; and adherence to APA guidelines for scholarly writing.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more